
Introduction
Acknowledgements
Preface
One
Suspending Judgment: The Post-Industrial City
Transformed
The Japanese Urban Continuum
Industrial Archipelago
The Port of Nagoya
Interchange
Enterprise Zone
Terminal
Kinjo Pier Logistics Terminal
Interface
The Bridge of Hesitation
Strategies of the Void
Workplace
Two
Generic City
The Ville Radieuse Legacy
The Radiant City in Japan
Agents of Transformation and the "Death" of Urbanism
Nagoyas New City
Mobility vs. Proximity
The Problem of Quantity
Preeminence of the Decorated Shed
Dead Space
Defunct Strategies
The Fourth Skin
Trauma of the New Interior
Death of the Façade
Zero-Degree Architecture
The Workplace Revisited
Three
Staging Uncertainty
Vivicities
Infratecture
Unveiling the Hidden Order
The New Fringe
Cité Post-Industrielle
Wiring the City
Complex Program
Eye of the Storm
In Place of the Public?
References |
|
[2L4] AGENTS OF TRANSFORMATION AND THE
"DEATH" OF URBANISM.
Beginning with the formal establishment of their movement at
the World Design Conference in Tokyo in 1960, the Metabolists declared an allegiance to
the uniquely organic Japanese city and its complex evolutionary processes. With an
optimistic fervor, they sought to develop a new language for architectural and urban
design which would be sensitive to the changeability of space and function, as opposed to
previous notions of fixed form and function.72 The projects that the architects
Kiyonori Kikutake, Fumihiko Maki, Masato Otaka, Kisho Kurokawa, and others developed were
concerned with alleviating problems of urban congestion, meanwhile embracing futuristic
visions of cities with moving and interchangeable parts, similar to the work of the
contemporary Archigram Group in London. Unlike the members of Archigram, who were more
theoretically oriented and stood in opposition to the establishment, the Metabolists
promoted the established design and building professions in Japan, and sought to work with
the increasingly eager and capable construction companies to realize their designs.73
Many of the projects, such as Kikutakes Floating City (1960) and Kenzo Tanges
Tokyo Plan (1960), involved urban-scale megastructures built above the sea or on
artificial land in order to ameliorate worsening urban conditions.
Toward the end of the decade, the
Metabolist movement came to a close, as a new generation of Japanese architects turned
their backs on mega-scale urban complexes, instead focusing on smaller,
contextually-sensitive projects. The Metabolists had planted the fertile seed of heroic
urban pragmatism, however, which has continued to influence the imaginations of Japanese
city planners and developers in subsequent decades. Nevertheless, the so-called death of
urbanism (which was, by all accounts, a global event) has led to the complete abandonment
of urban design, at a time when cities could benefit most from it.
What caused this death?
On one hand, once optimistic planners and architects were involved in too many failed
projects in the latter part of the twentieth century which left blighted or malfunctioning
urban landscapes, resulting in the notoriety of Modernism. On another hand, the proponents
of urban design discovered the countless social, political, and economic forces that shape
cities in a fundamental way to be hopelessly beyond their grasp. Rem Koolhaas highlights
this paradox: "Only 25 years ago architects were shamelessly projecting new cities.
Now they invest the same amount of energy in regretting the disappearance of the existing
city. The profession that once thought of itself as shaping the world no longer truly
believes it has anything to add."74 Thus, in an act of humiliating
acquiescence, advocates of the vernacular and the historic in architecture
gave in to mediocrity and led the design profession down the luddite path we now call
Postmodernism. In retrospect, however, if the International Style suggested a frightening
world of homogenization and sterility, devoid of regional and cultural differences,
Postmodernism only succeeded in exacerbating the situation by thematizing the past, thus
emptying culture of its significance and transforming the world into a global Disneyland.
What is more, Postmodernism is completely unreal. Not only is its imagery escapist, but at
an operational level it completely ignores the technological advances and lifestyle
transformations of our time. Thus, if Modernism resulted in a fight, then Postmodernism
only led to flight. And, like the collapse of the artificially inflated bubble economy it
fed, the empty age of design which Charles Jencks christened has reached its own end. We
have learned our lesson well, and now know that the answer lies somewhere between the
global and the regional, the heroic and the ordinary, the machine and the shed.
72Bognar,
Botond, The Japan Guide (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1995) p. 17
73Ibid., p. 32
74Koolhaas,
Rem, "Fishing in Troubled Waters" in Anywise, Ed. Cynthia Davidson
(Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1996) p. 160
Images: 1. Kenzo Tange, Osaka Expo
Pavilion (1970), 2. "Malling" the Globe
|