
Introduction
Acknowledgements
Preface
One
Suspending Judgment: The Post-Industrial City
Transformed
The Japanese Urban Continuum
Industrial Archipelago
The Port of Nagoya
Interchange
Enterprise Zone
Terminal
Kinjo Pier Logistics Terminal
Interface
The Bridge of Hesitation
Strategies of the Void
Workplace
Two
Generic City
The Ville Radieuse Legacy
The Radiant City in Japan
Agents of Transformation and the "Death" of Urbanism
Nagoyas New City
Mobility vs. Proximity
The Problem of Quantity
Preeminence of the Decorated Shed
Dead Space
Defunct Strategies
The Fourth Skin
Trauma of the New Interior
Death of the Façade
Zero-Degree Architecture
The Workplace Revisited
Three
Staging Uncertainty
Vivicities
Infratecture
Unveiling the Hidden Order
The New Fringe
Cité Post-Industrielle
Wiring the City
Complex Program
Eye of the Storm
In Place of the Public?
References |
|
[3L1] STAGING UNCERTAINTY.
It is now time for us to reinsert design
into the urban milieu. We are faced with exploding urban populations, most of which are in
third world countries, and can forecast threatening levels of congestion, environmental
destruction, and geographic dispersal (sprawl). In the next twenty years, we will see the
populations of Bombay, Lagos, Jakarta, and Shanghai double, from ten or fifteen million to
twenty or thirty million people. Koolhaas asks a significant question: "How to
explain the paradox that urbanism, as a profession, has disappeared at the moment when
urbanization everywhere - after decades of constant acceleration - is on its way to
establishing a definitive, global triumph of the urban condition?"112
Given the failures of Modernist urban planning, he suggests this future for urban design:
If there is to be a new urbanism it will not be based on the
twin fantasies of order and omnipotence; it will be the staging of uncertainty; it will no
longer be concerned with the arrangement of more or less permanent objects but with the
irrigation of territories with potential; it will no longer aim for stable configurations
but for the creation of enabling fields that accommodate processes that refuse to be
crystallized into definitive form; it will no longer be about meticulous definition, the
imposition of limits, but about expanding notions, denying boundaries, not about
separating and identifying entities, but about discovering unnameable hybrids; it will no
longer be obsessed with the city but with the manipulation of infrastructure113
for endless intensifications and diversifications, shortcuts and redistributions - the
reinvention of psychological space.114
In the end, Koolhaas warns, "Our systematic
self-doubt is suicidal: at the moment when issues of quantity are engulfing us like an
avalanche, it is essential to define a positive relationship with quantity."115
I believe that it is also essential that we reinsert ourselves (architects) into the
greater processes of development and transformation which have been taking place without
us.
112Koolhaas,
Rem, "What Ever Happened to Urbanism?" in S, M, L, XL (New York: The
Monacelli Press, 1995), p. 961
113my italics
114Koolhaas, Rem, "What Ever Happened to
Urbanism?" in S, M, L, XL (New York: The Monacelli Press, 1995), p. 969
115Koolhaas, Rem, "Fishing in Troubled
Waters" in Anywise, Ed. Cynthia Davidson (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT
Press, 1996) p. 161
Images: 1. Port of Nagoya |