titlebar.GIF (2711 bytes)
 

3dimap.gif (6550 bytes)

Introduction

Acknowledgements

Preface

One

Suspending Judgment: The Post-Industrial City Transformed

The Japanese Urban Continuum

Industrial Archipelago

The Port of Nagoya

Interchange

Enterprise Zone

Terminal

Kinjo Pier Logistics Terminal

Interface

The Bridge of Hesitation

Strategies of the Void

Workplace

Two

Generic City

The Ville Radieuse Legacy

The Radiant City in Japan

Agents of Transformation and the "Death" of Urbanism

Nagoya’s New City

Mobility vs. Proximity

The Problem of Quantity

Preeminence of the Decorated Shed

Dead Space

Defunct Strategies

The Fourth Skin

Trauma of the New Interior

Death of the Façade

Zero-Degree Architecture

The Workplace Revisited

Three

Staging Uncertainty

Vivicities

Infratecture

Unveiling the Hidden Order

The New Fringe

Cité Post-Industrielle

Wiring the City

Complex Program

Eye of the Storm

In Place of the Public?

References

[3L1] STAGING UNCERTAINTY.

Port of Nagoya

It is now time for us to reinsert design into the urban milieu. We are faced with exploding urban populations, most of which are in third world countries, and can forecast threatening levels of congestion, environmental destruction, and geographic dispersal (sprawl). In the next twenty years, we will see the populations of Bombay, Lagos, Jakarta, and Shanghai double, from ten or fifteen million to twenty or thirty million people. Koolhaas asks a significant question: "How to explain the paradox that urbanism, as a profession, has disappeared at the moment when urbanization everywhere - after decades of constant acceleration - is on its way to establishing a definitive, global ‘triumph’ of the urban condition?"112 Given the failures of Modernist urban planning, he suggests this future for urban design:

If there is to be a ‘new urbanism’ it will not be based on the twin fantasies of order and omnipotence; it will be the staging of uncertainty; it will no longer be concerned with the arrangement of more or less permanent objects but with the irrigation of territories with potential; it will no longer aim for stable configurations but for the creation of enabling fields that accommodate processes that refuse to be crystallized into definitive form; it will no longer be about meticulous definition, the imposition of limits, but about expanding notions, denying boundaries, not about separating and identifying entities, but about discovering unnameable hybrids; it will no longer be obsessed with the city but with the manipulation of infrastructure113 for endless intensifications and diversifications, shortcuts and redistributions - the reinvention of psychological space.114

In the end, Koolhaas warns, "Our systematic self-doubt is suicidal: at the moment when issues of quantity are engulfing us like an avalanche, it is essential to define a positive relationship with quantity."115 I believe that it is also essential that we reinsert ourselves (architects) into the greater processes of development and transformation which have been taking place without us.


112Koolhaas, Rem, "What Ever Happened to Urbanism?" in S, M, L, XL (New York: The Monacelli Press, 1995), p. 961

113my italics

114Koolhaas, Rem, "What Ever Happened to Urbanism?" in S, M, L, XL (New York: The Monacelli Press, 1995), p. 969

115Koolhaas, Rem, "Fishing in Troubled Waters" in Anywise, Ed. Cynthia Davidson (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1996) p. 161

Images: 1. Port of Nagoya

titlebar.GIF (2711 bytes)

title.GIF (6242 bytes)

A Master's Thesis in Architecture at Rice University by Blaine Brownell.

Copyright © 1998 by Blaine Brownell. All rights reserved.